艾金森
Amazon hires Disney SVP Kyle Laughlin as director of Alexa Gadgets
Apple’s battery cases return for the iPhone XS and XR
The Future Of TV Is HTML
This Week On Bullish: Can The Bold Italic Come Back?
Microsoft Drops New Windows 10 Mobile Build, Promises Faster Release Cadence
Cisco Pops 2.5% After Reporting Better-Than-Expected FQ4 Revenue Of $12.84B
Yahoo Sags 4% After Alibaba's Q2 Earnings Disappointment
Microsoft Postpones Ship Date For Its 'Surface Hub' Wall Computer To January
You Can Now Run Windows 10 On Your Mac
Microsoft Drops Another Windows 10 Update
Zulily's Buyout Spike Leaves It Less Valuable Than When It Went Public
Microsoft Launches New Windows 10 Build, Vows To Keep Its Early Access Program Alive


漂流瓶终于彻底拜拜 微信7.0.4新版体验
微信漂流瓶被玩坏了 聊聊漂流瓶里那些事
微信关闭漂流瓶 它曾经满足了我们对世界的好奇
微信暂停漂流瓶功能:对色情内容零容忍
[视频]惠普Chromebook x360 14 G1评测:搭载Chrome OS的商务变形本
特斯拉:北京客户可三年免息融资购车并免费租赁车牌
借贷宝:停止催收百名裸条女大学生 未满23岁将不得借贷
京东白条多地频现盗刷 消费者遭催收公司“逼债”
借款野蛮催收行为将被规范 真是几家欢喜几家愁
为规范网贷催收 上海互金协会发行业倡议书
腾讯解释为什么微信没有夜间模式 真相你相信吗?
一张发行8年的微信唱片:只收录了4首歌曲


Listen Carefully

当前位置: 艾金森 > 门户 > 海外资讯

点击量 30
编辑: 1   作者: Techcrunch   时间: 2018/12/6 2:38:06  

The way technology shapes language is fascinating. And often colloquially cringeworthy (to wit: 'I don't have bandwidth right now'... 'Let's take this offline'... 'I'd totally swipe that'...). At bottom it's?a reflection of how our?tools influence and shape our social interactions.

The reverse is also true, of course. Technology platforms end up being moulded by their human users in ways their makers did not envisage or necessarily intend when they built?the initial feature set and structure.

Hashtags on Twitter and?the Retweet function were essentially?user-generated, for instance. The people with early?access to an MVP?grabbed the baton and ran with it - and that combination of rough-and-ready technology?plus interested early adopters?resulted in something?fascinating and genuinely useful being?created. There's a lesson there in these times of increasingly?prescriptive?algorithms.

And, yes, as?a?counterpoint, we have the gaming of social platforms by hate speech groups bent on using the reach of mainstream social media to amplify fringe agendas, and silence the targets of their abuse, via co-ordinated bullying. Even Twitter?now thinks?it needs to up its game to deal with that kind of corrosive service misuse.

Stepping out from there, there are also parallel lessons to be drawn?from how people are talking about the technology services they are interacting with.?Not just in general terms - whether they like or dislike a service?and so on; but what their more subtle linguistic choices?might be expressing on their behalf. Reactions that might be evident in language before users are?consciously articulating their?feelings as fully formed thoughts.

One fascinating current example involves dating apps, and the use of a particular?phrase ?- "going dark" -?to describe what happens when a match stops responding. That is to say when the signaling between two users stops because one of them stops responding, despite there having been?a degree of?priorly stated mutual interest. (One wonders how Jane Austin might?have interrogated?such?hinged?moments.)

The developer?behind a machine-learning Tinder?bot which?hacks the dating app to automatically filter potential matches?based on the?user's prior aesthetic preferences, used the phrase in?a blog?about his project - noting that it was this characteristic?of dating app interactions that encouraged him to add an additional feature to his bot. This feature auto-starts conversations by sending pre-set messages to test the waters. An automated interest primer if you will.

Describing the?auto-messaging feature, he wrote:

The advantage of this? It removes the time involved in filtering new Tinder matches since a lot of people tend to drop off and “go dark” early in the process. Extended conversation is a strong indicator of interest.

It's a pitch?perfect engineer's fix for what is actually a far more interesting social problem that?dating apps are exposing to a greater degree of?social scrutiny by increasing the frequency of/encounters with this 'dropping off' behavior.

'Going dark' in fact hints at a kind of?social breaking point which?apps are stumbling into, at the cutting edge of human emotional interactions. It's the digital equivalent of a mild snub or social slight - very?slight, given it's not public and is doled out to someone you don't?yet have any strong ties to.

The fact these types of apps make it easier to meet new people means it necessarily follows their users?are going to encounter a higher volume of?explicit social rejections?than they normally would.?And so "going dark" is the phrase they?have come up with to describe an?antisocial byproduct?of using a socially 'catalyzing' service - and, perhaps, to take some of the sting out of all those 'I'm not/no longer interested' signals.

Since?dating apps enable surface connections to be made more quickly it logically?follows they are also responsible for more speedy social disconnections. And so the necessity to coin a phrase?for this now?more commonly?experienced behavior - ergo:?"going dark".

Going dark is, in my view, a pretty great descriptor for this dating app foible, since it characterizes?other users as so many pixels that?can either light up or not, when you ping them, rather than as flesh and blood humans who have stopped responding and are therefore actively snubbing you. Which of course they (probably) are.?But the point is it shows users taking a sophisticated approach to what can be very throwaway interactions - on account of these apps making it so easy to engage with randoms.

In essence, the humans are defusing all the subtle disconnections that?such a high volume of?digital interactions inevitably entails. After all,?virtual social snubs aren't really all that. And digital dating relations are necessarily cheap, given they aren't (yet) deep.

If there is any cause for concern here, it's that "going dark" entering the dating app user lexicon may also signify interaction overload. That people?are being swamped with so?many?signals?they feel unable to respond, politely or otherwise, to each and every match?- and so are resorting to?switching off the messaging channel to enable them?to move on and keep using the app. Aka they?are taking the path of least resistance.

(Silence may also be the most tactful way to say 'no thanks' to a prospective date - rather than having to explain at length that while they seem(ed) interesting their follow up?signals have not struck such an interesting chord. Another?example of this sort of subtle social signaling at play in the digital space is the way?Twitter users deploy?the star feature as a word-free meta-communication method. A way to say something without actually saying anything.)

Through a lens, darkly

The underlying concept?of "going dark" also brings to mind the?latest?Black Mirror episode -?Black Mirror?being?Charlie Brooker's satirical TV series which imagines how technology tools might warp our social interactions in a not-too-far-flung future.?In the holiday special, screened before Christmas, a fictional story unfolds?involving people?who have had embedded cameras (called Z-Eyes) implanted into?their eyes - which enables them to activate advanced augmented reality functions such as filtering out?the sight and sound?of?particular?individuals.

When activated, instead?of a person they see a fuzzy silhouette and hear garbled noises rather than actual?words. Brooker calls?this feature "being blocked". It's like an extreme manifestation of going dark. But one that absolutely stings - given it distorts actual human face-to-face interactions. Brooker's point is that applying digital social management tricks?at the point?of flesh and blood contact?absolutely crosses a line. Or to put it another way, it's a man in the middle attack on human communications.

Another linguistic signifier for technology that is failing to appreciate the nuance of social interaction is the pejorative?term?'Glasshole' - used to brand?and mark out for social censure users of Google's (not at all fictional) face computer, Glass.

Like the fictional Z-Eyes, Glass is a?hybrid device which?uneasily straddles the?digital and physical worlds. The social unease it?generates has been obvious, and amply explains why consumers have generally shunned it. (And why Google has been forced to have a major rethink.) No one is coining sensitive wording?such as?"go dark" to describe Glass' influence?on?their social lives. Because?consumers aren't allowing?it into their lives. The problems inherent with?the technology are writ-large in the language that does, and does not, coalesce around it.

Developing products that are not isolated and separated from?their social context is the crux?here. And?the tl;dr? Linguistic alienation can be a symptom of a far greater disconnect.

Listen carefully?to the?language your product generates?and it might, as in the case of?all those dating app users flicking the?kill switch on matches, flag up potential service stress points. Or even - in the case of Glass and its surface tension?of 'Glassholes' -?illuminate the antisocial crux of your?abject failure.